Author: The "D" Man

We could ask ‘How long is a piece of string”?

 If we simplify wing Chun the training objective is to minimise incoming force while maximising outgoing force.

This is a game of opposites, accept incoming force with cotton and issue force with steel.

All techniques and strategies pay fealty to this IDEA.

Our concepts are suggestions and not directions, this leaves a great deal of room for interpretation, adlib, and creativity, but it also leaves us open to misunderstandings and working against ourselves.

One concept, ‘Wing Chun does not use Hard Blocking’ is a potential misunderstanding.

What is a ‘Hard Block’?

We could ask ‘How long is a piece of string”?

So what is a Hard Block?  A ‘Hard Block’ is a clash of Arms.

Question.

Is there a time and place of contact where we move from Soft Block to Medium Block? 

Or a transition from Medium Block to Hard Block?

The term ‘Hard’ is an infinitely variable metric that can never be in the same place on two successive instances or be the same quality or amount of HARDNESS for two different people.

Blocking is contact, and contact is a clash.

And clashing invokes the Law of Action/Reaction.

It is a shared event that is determined by two separate sides.

We need to re-explain this Concept as Wing Chun does not Clash with our opponent’s Arms.

One of the most overused cliches in Martial Arts is that of building a House.

When building a house, there are hierarchies that if avoided or approached out of order the task becomes infinitely more challenging.

We could for instance begin by building a roof, then suspend it and build walls down from that roof.

There is no getting away from the fact that a house is made of a roof, walls and a floor, eventually, we need to create all of these to have a house.

Conventional wisdom, and more than likely experience, favours building a slab, erecting walls, and then adding a roof. 

Learning Wing Chun is just like building a House.

We can work on and learn the Forms in any order we choose, but some ways are easier than others.

As wildly confusing as it may sound approaching Wing Chun as a Martial Art in a physical sense is beginning by moving in the wrong direction.

It is not possible to learn the truth of Wing Chun by studying shapes and movements alone, the shapes and movements that are most commonly used are, in all truth, shapes and movements taken from other styles that were popular at the time.

We could just as well use any known style.

Shapes and movements are important, but as keys and not as weapons.

The shapes and movements open doors upon practices that refine and improve those same shapes and movements.

I genuinely believe that we could begin our study of Wing Chun with any of the  Wing Chun Forms, even including the Mom Jan Jong, but just like the house, it is easier if we start with a good foundation.

This foundation is what I refer to as ‘CRAZY HORSE’, a device to hang the clothes known as Sil Lim Tao, Chum Kiu, Biu Gee and Mok Jan Jong on.

Once we have developed ‘CRAZY HORSE’ we could well start with Bill Gee.

But staying with the house-building analogy for a moment, to achieve good foundations it is vital that we build on solid ground.

The ‘solid ground, that we build on in Wing Chun is a previously learned skill set.

If we do not have a previously learned skill set then it stands to reason that we first must develop one.

The physical aspect of Wing Chun training, the aspect that so many people, especially YouTubers, think is what makes up Wing Chun, you know, the making contact bit, is nothing more than the setting up of solid ground to put our foundations on.

The real work begins once we have shapes we trust, once we have an effective way of moving.

In short, the real work begins once we know how to fight.

The video below quickly became longer than I intended so I will cover the manifestation of weight and how to use it at a later date, it is a really interesting and powerful topic which is relatively easy to grasp.

Be aware that he audio volume of the following clip is overly loud so do yourself a favour and lower the volume before clicking play.

NOTHING HAPPENS UNTIL SOMETHING MOVES.

ALBERT EINSTEIN.

It is your journey and your choice.

Richard asked if I could put a post up to cover as much of Chum Kiu as I could, I am pretty sure it will be of use to a few of you.

First off, when listening to anyone about any Form from any style stay aware of the fact that a Form is nothing more than a structural framework that allows the concepts to be laid out in a way that makes sense to the right person at the right time.

In due course we will all interpret the information [any Form] in a way that fits the way we think and compliments the way we move.

Remain mentally flexible.

Let’s get to it.

What is the best way to approach Chum Kiu?

We can approach Chum Kiu in as many ways as we can think up, it can be super simple such as “How many new moves are the in Chum Kiu that I need to understand”?

The answer to this is just 2?!

Pivoting and Shifting.

Or we can dig deep into every nuanced interpretation and now there are millions of ways.

The best is, as with everything, start small and grow, from the super simple to the insanely complex.

It is your journey and your choice.

There are some personal picks from the archive below that will help your journey and save you making a detour into the past posts department.

FROM THE ARCHIVE.

Here are some earlier posts that will help with the work and the training of the aspects we explore with Chum Kiu.

I recommend reading the text to the posts as it sometimes adds clarity to the context of the video, but if you are stuck for time, as we all are, just watch the vids.

This is a pretty complete overview of the Chum Kiu application from the perspective of vectors, but it is quite long, Video duration 18 minutes. https://wordpress.com/post/wingchunsydney.com/1456

This is a medium length video that helps understand the transition from Crazy horse to Chum kiu. Video duration 09 minutes. https://wordpress.com/post/wingchunsydney.com/2064

This pivoting primer that is one of the best videos I have done for information transmission that can be easily used. Video duration 11 minutes. https://wordpress.com/post/wingchunsydney.com/1482

This post will also aid with pivoting. Video duration 07 minutes. https://wingchunsydney.com/2020/01/18/tension-and-torsion/

This post is mostly about punching but it has good instruction on Core Winding. Video duration 05 minutes.https://wordpress.com/post/wingchunsydney.com/509

This post is about the often overlooked aspect of sinking and Rising. An inherent part of all movement. Video duration 07 minutes. https://wordpress.com/post/wingchunsydney.com/2331

This post covers the summation of forces. The heart of Chum Kiu. Video duration 03 minutes. https://wordpress.com/post/wingchunsydney.com/2290

We are not people learning to use Wing Chun, we are people choosing Wing Chun to learn how to use ourselves.

Everything will work to a certain extent, and everything will fail to a certain extent.

Becoming capable is about 3 things.

Understanding how our body works

Understanding our styles philosophy, our ‘FIST LOGIC’

Understanding how to build a bridge between the two.

Because if we ever find ourselves in a violent situation…

… it will be on that bridge.

We are not people learning to use Wing Chun, we are people choosing Wing Chun to learn how to use ourselves.

Asking will my Martial art work is a little bit like asking will this stick work?

It will if you know how to use it, and are willing to use it.

There is a joke here in Oz. 

Q. What do you call a Boomerang that does not come back?

A. A stick.

The moral of this tale is choosing the right stick.

Whenever we talk about interacting with another Human Being, be it in a violent situation or otherwise, and especially if we are giving suggestions on how to interact with another Human Being, we should always prefix the statement with “It depends”.

So when our Combat Athlete cousins say that our training sucks, we need to approach it from the position of “it depends’.

Because sometimes it does, and we do not even realise this.

Especially if the approach is that of the Mind leading the Body, as it is with much of Kung Fu.

The Tai Chi Classics tell us that “where the Mind leads, the Chi follows’, and my own teacher would say that the ultimate expression of Wing Chun is when the Mind does the work.

Modern advances in medical imaging, especially in the area of Magnetic Resonance imaging, have shown which areas of the brain are stimulated in response to physical pain, which essentially is the same as any physical sensation such as making contact,.

The results leave us without doubt that it is the Body that influences the Brain and not the other way around, this is important because it shines a light on the fact that what we think we are doing is not what is happening, and how we react to this experience, the ‘Take Away’ so to speak [ in a training environment this can be viewed as what we think we are learning] is often the opposite of what we think will happen.

This is a huge, complex subject, but relatively easy to wrap our heads around, that I will go into at a later date.

Understanding this is the difference between choosing a Boomerang or choosing a Stick.

“Are these moves really important, or are we being played”?

The ‘RULE OF THREES’ is a useful tool when presenting anything to an audience, it tends to get more engagement.

When we consider how closely related Kung Fu is to Theatre and Ritual it is easy to see why this tool is so widely used in Kung Fu Forms.

In Wing Chun, we are told that any movement in any form that is done three times is of more value to our training than something done twice or only once.

The question arises, unwelcome as it is…

“Are these moves really important, or are we being played”?

All that aside, on Thursday evening we did some things that I would like us all to be on the same page about.

Solo training can be difficult to value, but I assure you without a serious approach to solo training we remain nothing more than players.

like most of the posts on FaceBook this sounds good, but, it is actually Bullshit.

This is a reposting to keep the information flow going, somehow I keep messing up the videos, we had a great session this morning but I forgot to turn on the Camera, DUH. Hopefully I will record it on Thursday evening.

This video is about similar things to what we are working on so I hope you get something from it. Try to look at it from the perspective of getting in place to use a one-inch strike, which as we have been talking about is the only way we can exchange maximum weight with maximum accuracy.

Hey Guys,

Sam, Costas and I were working on stuff on Saturday that I thought was quite important to share, we lost the sound early into the piece so there is no commentary on the practice, all the same I am posting a few frames of what we did, with a bit of Timo Mass playing, to seed the water so to speak.

We will revisit this on Thursday evening so if you can, be here, and get all the information instead of just about 5% which is all we really put in these videos.

The heart of this matter is a better understanding of the whole idea of being fast.

Mark Zuckerberg once stated that his motto for Facebook was “Move fast and break things”, like most of the posts on FaceBook this sounds good, but, it is actually Bullshit.

The Wolves do not train for what they do, it is part of their nature, and this is important.

The title of this post is also the title of an essay by By LTC (RET) Dave Grossman, author of “On Killing.”  

Here is a paragraph from the essay and a link to the complete text.

“Then there are the wolves,” the old war veteran said, “and the wolves feed on the sheep without mercy.” Do you believe there are wolves out there who will feed on the flock without mercy? You better believe it. There are evil men in this world and they are capable of evil deeds. The moment you forget that or pretend it is not so, you become a sheep. There is no safety in denial.

“Then there are sheepdogs,” he went on, “and I’m a sheepdog. I live to protect the flock and confront the wolf.”

Here is the link to the complete essay.  https://www.mwkworks.com/onsheepwolvesandsheepdogs.html

To a minor extent, people who choose to study any Martial Art fit into the Sheepdog category, even when they aim only to defend themselves.

I do not expect many people to take the time to read the whole essay, especially as it is specifically American and mostly aimed at “First Responder” types, so here are two of the final sentences that sum up the mood of the text.

This business of being a sheep or a sheep dog is not a yes-no dichotomy. It is not an all-or-nothing, either-or choice. It is a matter of degrees, a continuum.

The degree to which you move up that continuum, away from sheephood and denial, is the degree to which you and your loved ones will survive, physically and psychologically at your moment of truth.

There is a great deal to unpack in this essay, some may find it challenging to see their own life and experiences reflected in it, but it is there for all of us if we know what to look for.

Generalising and simplifying society into these three categories in a way we can relate to could be that there are people who willingly and without excuse randomly and viciously attack people they do not know.

This would be the Wolf, its main weapon is deceit and surprise, and these people rarely take any kind of organised training.

Then there are the Sheep, we all hold our own IDEA of who and what they are.

And lastly the Sheepdog.  A person who unflinchingly places themselves in harm’s way, even if it is for only personal safety and this type of person is usually trained and frequently still training.

The Wolves do not train for what they do, it is part of their nature, and this is important.

It helps us develop a deeper understanding of the “Context” involved in random violence, it helps us get a deeper understanding of what we can expect from our training, and it allows us to face without the slightest embaresment the claim from “Combat Athletes’ or even those in our traditional Martial Arts community that favour competition, that our training is bogus and useless due to it focusing on simplistic “Generic Attacks”.

Which of course it does.

But that is the point.

IF YOU REALLY WANT TO GET BETTER,

DO NOT TRY TO DO MORE.

THINK LIKE A CHESS COMPUTER AND DEAL WITH THE JOB AT HAND.

Something that I think we are all a little bit guilty of is to think that there is more to dealing with violence than there is, we all do it, and I am not sure if there is any way to prevent this, so our best way forwards is to accept it and find a way to work around it.

A well proven method to improve anything is to reduce it to the simplest form that can still do the same work.

This is the Principal of Parsimony. {A.K.A. Occam’s Razor}.

The principle that the most acceptable explanation of an occurrence, phenomenon, or event is the simplest, involving the fewest entities, assumptions, or changes.

This is the philosophy of many Martial Art styles, but it is by no way the practice.

Even with Wing Chun, which has at its core the Principle of Simplicity, we spend many years learning how to deal with something that happens in a split second.

Can you relate to the tale below…

As a kid I was a decent Chess player, I represented my School and up until my early 30s I was an active member of a chess club. 

Like all chess enthusiasts I had dozens of books, I re-played famous games from past masters to try to improve my game, and like everyone else I thought that we must be able to see 5 or more moves ahead.

Then around 1983  I bought my first consumer level chess computer.

Even at its lower levels I lost.

I only began to win games once I began to play the way the computer played. And that was by treating every move as a seperate problem that only needed to solve that single situation.

I was still a chess club player and in what appeared to everyone else as overnight, I began to win a great deal more matches than I lost, along the way I took some notable scalps for my current standing, to be expected the much better players still beat me, but I went from “D” grade to “B” grade in 2 tournaments.

THINK LIKE A CHESS COMPUTER AND DEAL WITH THE JOB AT HAND.

From a personal prospective what is the problem we are trying to solve? 

What is the simplest way of solving it?

For instance….

From a “Fighting” perspective this is simply “how do I hit my opponent”?

As a Self-Defence problem it becomes “how do I stop my opponent hitting me”?

This approach allows for great personalisation instead of trying to make someone else’s IDEA work for us.

So how do we stop someone from hitting us?

The answers vary from run away, to hit them first, and all things in between.

But whichever answer we choose it will be our own answer.

Now we can direct our training into something we think is a good IDEA.

But how do we train that IDEA without getting swayed by our partisan bias?