Uncategorized

BALANCE, STABILITY and COORDINATION.

If one moves they all move if one stops they all stop.

The most famous maxim in Real Estate is “Location, Location, Location”, the implication being that substance can be developed or improved later, in fact things can be demolished and rebuilt if the “Ground” we chose was fit for purpose.

In every style of Martial Arts this “Ground”, is the fundamentals of Self-control, the “Basics” of Human movement…

Balance, Stability and co-ordination.

Once developed this understanding is reinforced by an individual styles structure and philosophy.

It is one of life’s most curious enigmas that the people that would benefit the most from studying these basics tend to rush past them in pursuit of the so called advanced methods, ignoring older information for something newer without first reading the older information that they so obviously birthed from.

The stats for this blog tell me that very few visitors use the menu bar to explore what ,as the author of this blog, I think are the “Jewels in the Crown”.

Here is one of the posts that live in the Structure/Frame dropdown menu, this information is so central to everything else we do it could be used instead of standard training.

Balance and Stability:

Keeping it simple Balance is maintaining equilibrium when motionless against nothing but the Force of Gravity.

Balance is motionless, if we are moving it is more accurate to talk about Stability.

Stability is maintaining or regaining Balance against outside forces, including forces created by ourselves, as in our own movement.

Balance is motionless and Stability is maintaining or regaining Balance, therefore Stability is about remaining or becoming still.

Some confusion arises because frequently Stability is referred to as either Static Balance or Dynamic Balance, especially if we include coordination, in this context :

Static Balance refers to the ability to maintain the body’s centre of mass within its base of support, as in standing still.

Dynamic Balance refers to the ability to move the centre of mass outside the body’s base of support, while maintaining postural control as in moving.

Balance and Coordination.

 Dynamic Balance is the ability to stay upright or maintain control of body movement, and Coordination is the ability to move two or more body parts under this control, smoothly and efficiently.

As always the best approach is to do your own research and form your own opinion.

Three important principals of Balance / Stability.

  1. A broader base of support {wider feet} increases stability.
  2. Keeping the line of gravity central inside the support base increases stability.
  3. A lower centre of gravity increases stability.

From a Wing Chun perspective, the lower stances / positions of the Chum Kiu and Baat Cham do are more Stable than the higher stance / position of the First Form {S.L.T}.

Getting back to the previous statement that “Balance is motionless and Stability is maintaining or regaining Balance”, it is more useful to think that Stability is about remaining or becoming still, we can see that the movements activated through the various Wing Chun Forms are not so much about moving to or from an opponent but rather moving from one position of equilibrium to another, moving to a new position of Stability, they are about stopping.

This is an important factor in power production and in keeping with the Conservation of Momentum Theory.

If we use the Chum Kiu Form as our testing ground the cycle of movements should go from being still {Static Balance} through the sequence or movement of choice, for instance the lateral shifting with Dai Sau and Bong sau {Dynamic Balance} culminating in stillness at the completion of the sequence or movement {back to Static Balance}.

The movement of the arms adds extra complexity to maintaining Balance by introducing new vectors but the main take away for the arms is in developing coordination of the upper and lower body, the action should fill the same time period, both stopping and starting,  as the movement of the legs and waist. 

If one moves they all move if one stops they all stop.

The Wing Chun Forms are subtle and use minimal movement deliberately, because of this it can be difficult to observe the movements in detail, it is often easier and more effective to have stand alone exercises to study this, once we are familiar with the connections between Balance, Stability, Coordination and Movement the understanding can be transposed onto the various Forms.

BALANCE / STABILITY OVERVIEW.

BALANCE

POSTURE.

CORE ACTIVATION.

FIST LOGIC

BEING OUR BEST AT THE WORST OF TIMES.

Do you know your weaknesses, more importantly, do you know how to avoid them?

There is something that we should never forget, and that is…

why we are training?

We are learning to defend ourselves against a persons or persons that intends us serious physical harm.

Despite that training is fun and enjoyable, as I think it should be…

We are not playing.

We are not learning to dance.

Question? Do you know your weaknesses, and more importantly, do you know how to avoid them?

How can we plan for something that we do not even know is going to happen?

Let’s start with the worse thing we can think of, it will be different for all of us but be honest to yourself, there is no need for anyone else to know, we all have one darker fear and if we are ever slipping towards it, we will panic big time if we have not at least played it out in our minds a few times.

My favourite military maxim that should always be considered is …. ‘no battle plan survives contact with the enemy’.

This is not about being real, it is about being semi-prepared, engage your imagination, if in doubt about what would happen in a real situation pick the worst option you can think of.

I will use my worst fear as an example, but it is just the thought process that is important, develop, ask and answer your own questions.

My biggest worry is that I am on the floor!!!

Question #1. How did I get here?

Did the Bad Guy knock me down? Did he catch a kick I attempted and threw me? Did I trip over my own feet?

Most fights that end up on the floor are there because people fall over much more than someone does Ju-Jitsu.

Whatever caused this problem becomes an area for involvement in our training, develop a style that kicks less, stays out of reach of your partner, and develops a better, more well-balanced movement.

Question #2. Could I have prevented this?

If it was something the Bad Guy did what happened that allowed him to be in a position to do that?

Was it his skill and speed or was it a case of me being inattentive or late to respond?

Either way, this problem was caused by not being in control of my personal space and something I can take into training is the question “what does it mean to control my personal space”?

As a training exercise in Chi Sau get a friend to continuously press you and work on maintaining the same shape, position and distance from them at all times.

Ask yourself can I control my personal space by standing in one spot while my attacker is mobile, there is no correct or incorrect answer here, just a specific personal idea that we can train to be more natural.

Question #3. Was he fast or was I slow?

We can always work on our speed, especially the speed we think, our body only ever works at the speed of our thoughts, to a very large extent being quick is about having fewer choices to deliberate on.

Do not waste valuable mental processing time on trying to develop or use ‘Mind Force’, be deliberate and only think about things you can do that will actively help.

If we do not know how to transition from one situation or one position to another we will be stuck in both time and space and an easy target.

Again as a Chi Sau drill work on changing shapes, stances, and positions in space.

Create a drill in Chi Sau where one partner applies a strong forward drive, and the other partner tries to find a way to get behind the aggressor, do not be nice to each other, make it a win / lose game.

In training we usually tend to just do as we are told, often there is no genuine connection to what we as students think may happen, or what we may need, and very rarely is there any student input to reflect a personal worry or experience.

As Instructors we should encourage this type of engagement, as students, we should force ourselves to ask questions, even when we think they may be stupid.

Nearly everything we do in Wing Chun falls under the umbrella of simultaneous attack and defence, in so many street situations this is a practical impossibility. The IDEA is sound, but how close can we get to it?

In street situations the attacker has no time to try to find the best shot, there is no feinting, no dodging and weaving patiently seeking a better position, it is just a flurry of whatever and it is instantly in our face.

Most street violence that Wing Chun would engage with, the average mugging, for instance, is over in less time than it takes to read this sentence.

I am serious, if we lose control of the first 4 or 5 seconds it is ‘lights out and go home’.

If we do not see it coming we are not going to stop it from happening, this is an alarming thought, but it is what it is.

There is a saying in the Boxing World, “it is the punch you do not see that knocks you out”!

Question #4. Why was I unprepared?

No one can teach functional situational awareness because the situation changes from day to day and place to place, because of this most situations we find ourselves in will appear to be almost out of nowhere.

Unpreparedness is our default position, get used to it, train it.

If our regular training does not include ways to regain a good position from a bad position then the prognosis will be terminal, do not fall for the fantasy that Biu Gee teaches emergency techniques, find a way to make space and regain balance.

Question #5. How did this situation arise?

The only way to avoid potential problems is to see them as they evolve, and leave before conception.

Most people that fail in a violent situation do not fail because of a lack of skill or ability, it is usually a lack of trust, or a lack of confidence all made more destructive by the shock inherent in being attacked.

There are hundreds if not thousands of violently effective people who have no training at all in our world, but they are courageous to the level of foolhardiness, they will walk into our fists, we have a huge advantage if we can only bring it to the fore.

Think.

Plan ahead.

Survive.

This is what all training should be. Any other approach is leading to the wrong choice at the wrong time.

Work on your weaknesses, play to your strengths.

WHAT KIND OF DAY IS IT FOR YOU?
FOOD FOR THOUGHT.

HISTORY, CAN WE TRUST IT?

 

IT MUST BE TRUE, ITS DAI-SIGUNG ALBERT.

 

Hong Kong and Taiwan’s versions of Chinese history may not be quite as false as the C.C.Ps but they are just as far off the mark.

 

Over the past 50 years, I have read numerous books and article on how successive Chinese governments, in the wake of the disastrous ‘Boxer Rebellion’ 1899 – 1901 {so-called due to the fact that it expanded out from Kung Fu Schools}, began systematically changing China’s self-image, its belief systems and political ideologies.

Their favourite method was to re-write history.

Firstly with the nationalists, the K.M.T. and then later with the Chinese Communist Party.

Growing up in the west through the 60s the NEWS was constantly calling China out for the destruction of Temples, the burning of records, in short, the ‘re-education’ policies that essentially gave non-party members the choice of ‘Change or Die’.

Many did just that, and sadly so did historical truth.

Due to this, trying to gather accurate historic information about any style of Kung Fu is difficult bordering on possible.

I do realise that there is a lot of documented so-called historic information out there but we must take all of this with a pinch of salt.

Re-written means just that, re-written.

As Martial Artists we are well aware that the C.C.P. removed all of the ‘Fighting Aspects’ out of Kung Fu and replaced them with movement patterns from ballet and acrobatics and relabeled it Wushu, and then invented/reinvented the modern IDEA of Qigong, here is a link to an interesting article make of it what you wish.

Chairman Mao was well aware that the Tong system, something he saw as akin to a cult or at least a secret society, that allowed the Boxers {Kung Fu organisations as secret societies} to organise and combine to fight the Europeans would be a real threat to his hold on the people and banned all ‘Tongs’ and all meetings with regards to these organisations.

There are those in the M.A. community that claim this is why Hong Kong and Taiwan are the true centres of Kung Fu, but it was the Nationalists, the K.M.T. that began this transformation and re-writing of history and it was these same K.M.T. and Nationalists that fled to Hong Kong and Taiwan after the Civil War taking their ideas of the New China with them.

Hong Kong and Taiwan’s versions of Chinese history may not be quite as false as the C.C.Ps but they are just as far off the mark.

Where does leave us, westerners, when we wish to know where our style comes from and why it was created in the first place because it is only by knowing the answer to these two questions that we can truly understand what we do.

One thing we can look at is the history of China as recorded by the Europeans that traded with China, I am not saying for one minute that these are of any more accurate because to be expected they were observed through the lens of European agenda, and measured by European values.

The picture that those histories paint is relatively accurate when it comes to the general mood of the people and the way society interacted, the very thing we wish to know about as Martial Artists.

From 1600 up to 1960 there was an almost constant state of Militaristic conflict, province against province, village against village, ethnicity against ethnicity, religion against religion.

Violence was everywhere and every day, shortage of food was a constant cause of this violence, squabbles over the rightful ownership of fertile land escalated into full-blown conflicts so often that villages had their private militias, the problem was so widespread that temples had warrior monks and no one travelled without highly trained and armed caravan guards.

Politics aside hundreds of years of violence created a country where defending yourself and your property was as essential as breathing, every man in every village was armed to the teeth and ready to rumble at the first sign of trouble.

Except for that guy, the Kung Fu guy.

Why do we think this guy was fighting un-armed when even the monks used weapons?

As a thought exercise, this can be an interesting question.

Had he lost his weapon?

Had he been disarmed?

Was he caught out at a place that he considered safe and as such was unarmed?

As interesting as this is something that this line of thinking misses is that if Mr.K. Fu is unarmed his attacker is unlikely to be.

Empty hand styles did not materialise so that people could engage in a game of ‘fisty cuffs’, they came about as a way to deal with an armed assailant when you were for some reason unarmed.

If we look at how Kung Fu, and from my perspective Wing Chun, interacts with an attacker it makes more sense once we add a weapon to the scenario, Chi Sau looks more like a way of disarming or controlling a weapon arm than just a sensitivity exercise and it shines a fresh light on our stances, guards and footwork.

It also ends once and for all the Kung Fu v M.M.A. argument which I will go into later, but for now, these are just my musings, I have no way to prove any of this but it feels a great deal more “REAL” than most of the accepted history.

 

 

WHAT KIND OF DAY IS IT FOR YOU?

 

FIST LOGIC

CHOOSING THE RIGHT STICK.

We are not people learning to use Wing Chun, we are people choosing Wing Chun to learn how to use ourselves.

Everything will work to a certain extent, and everything will fail to a certain extent.

Becoming capable is about 3 things.

Understanding how our body works

Understanding our styles philosophy, our ‘FIST LOGIC’

Understanding how to build a bridge between the two.

Because if we ever find ourselves in a violent situation…

… it will be on that bridge.

We are not people learning to use Wing Chun, we are people choosing Wing Chun to learn how to use ourselves.

Asking will my Martial art work is a little bit like asking will this stick work?

It will if you know how to use it, and are willing to use it.

There is a joke here in Oz. 

Q. What do you call a Boomerang that does not come back?

A. A stick.

The moral of this tale is choosing the right stick.

Whenever we talk about interacting with another Human Being, be it in a violent situation or otherwise, and especially if we are giving suggestions on how to interact with another Human Being, we should always prefix the statement with “It depends”.

So when our Combat Athlete cousins say that our training sucks, we need to approach it from the position of “it depends’.

Because sometimes it does, and we do not even realise this.

Especially if the approach is that of the Mind leading the Body, as it is with much of Kung Fu.

The Tai Chi Classics tell us that “where the Mind leads, the Chi follows’, and my own teacher would say that the ultimate expression of Wing Chun is when the Mind does the work.

Modern advances in medical imaging, especially in the area of Magnetic Resonance imaging, have shown which areas of the brain are stimulated in response to physical pain, which essentially is the same as any physical sensation such as making contact,.

The results leave us without doubt that it is the Body that influences the Brain and not the other way around, this is important because it shines a light on the fact that what we think we are doing is not what is happening, and how we react to this experience, the ‘Take Away’ so to speak [ in a training environment this can be viewed as what we think we are learning] is often the opposite of what we think will happen.

This is a huge, complex subject, but relatively easy to wrap our heads around, that I will go into at a later date.

Understanding this is the difference between choosing a Boomerang or choosing a Stick.

FIST LOGIC

SOLO PLAY, THE RULE OF THREES AND SOME OTHER STUFF.

“Are these moves really important, or are we being played”?

The ‘RULE OF THREES’ is a useful tool when presenting anything to an audience, it tends to get more engagement.

When we consider how closely related Kung Fu is to Theatre and Ritual it is easy to see why this tool is so widely used in Kung Fu Forms.

In Wing Chun, we are told that any movement in any form that is done three times is of more value to our training than something done twice or only once.

The question arises, unwelcome as it is…

“Are these moves really important, or are we being played”?

All that aside, on Thursday evening we did some things that I would like us all to be on the same page about.

Solo training can be difficult to value, but I assure you without a serious approach to solo training we remain nothing more than players.

HOKKA HEY

WHAT KIND OF DAY IS IT FOR YOU?
FIST LOGIC

FIRST BEATS FAST.

like most of the posts on FaceBook this sounds good, but, it is actually Bullshit.

This is a reposting to keep the information flow going, somehow I keep messing up the videos, we had a great session this morning but I forgot to turn on the Camera, DUH. Hopefully I will record it on Thursday evening.

This video is about similar things to what we are working on so I hope you get something from it. Try to look at it from the perspective of getting in place to use a one-inch strike, which as we have been talking about is the only way we can exchange maximum weight with maximum accuracy.

Hey Guys,

Sam, Costas and I were working on stuff on Saturday that I thought was quite important to share, we lost the sound early into the piece so there is no commentary on the practice, all the same I am posting a few frames of what we did, with a bit of Timo Mass playing, to seed the water so to speak.

We will revisit this on Thursday evening so if you can, be here, and get all the information instead of just about 5% which is all we really put in these videos.

The heart of this matter is a better understanding of the whole idea of being fast.

Mark Zuckerberg once stated that his motto for Facebook was “Move fast and break things”, like most of the posts on FaceBook this sounds good, but, it is actually Bullshit.

what moon?
FIST LOGIC

On Sheep, Wolves, and Sheepdogs.

The Wolves do not train for what they do, it is part of their nature, and this is important.

The title of this post is also the title of an essay by By LTC (RET) Dave Grossman, author of “On Killing.”  

Here is a paragraph from the essay and a link to the complete text.

“Then there are the wolves,” the old war veteran said, “and the wolves feed on the sheep without mercy.” Do you believe there are wolves out there who will feed on the flock without mercy? You better believe it. There are evil men in this world and they are capable of evil deeds. The moment you forget that or pretend it is not so, you become a sheep. There is no safety in denial.

“Then there are sheepdogs,” he went on, “and I’m a sheepdog. I live to protect the flock and confront the wolf.”

Here is the link to the complete essay.  https://www.mwkworks.com/onsheepwolvesandsheepdogs.html

To a minor extent, people who choose to study any Martial Art fit into the Sheepdog category, even when they aim only to defend themselves.

I do not expect many people to take the time to read the whole essay, especially as it is specifically American and mostly aimed at “First Responder” types, so here are two of the final sentences that sum up the mood of the text.

This business of being a sheep or a sheep dog is not a yes-no dichotomy. It is not an all-or-nothing, either-or choice. It is a matter of degrees, a continuum.

The degree to which you move up that continuum, away from sheephood and denial, is the degree to which you and your loved ones will survive, physically and psychologically at your moment of truth.

There is a great deal to unpack in this essay, some may find it challenging to see their own life and experiences reflected in it, but it is there for all of us if we know what to look for.

Generalising and simplifying society into these three categories in a way we can relate to could be that there are people who willingly and without excuse randomly and viciously attack people they do not know.

This would be the Wolf, its main weapon is deceit and surprise, and these people rarely take any kind of organised training.

Then there are the Sheep, we all hold our own IDEA of who and what they are.

And lastly the Sheepdog.  A person who unflinchingly places themselves in harm’s way, even if it is for only personal safety and this type of person is usually trained and frequently still training.

The Wolves do not train for what they do, it is part of their nature, and this is important.

It helps us develop a deeper understanding of the “Context” involved in random violence, it helps us get a deeper understanding of what we can expect from our training, and it allows us to face without the slightest embaresment the claim from “Combat Athletes’ or even those in our traditional Martial Arts community that favour competition, that our training is bogus and useless due to it focusing on simplistic “Generic Attacks”.

Which of course it does.

But that is the point.


IF YOU REALLY WANT TO GET BETTER,

DO NOT TRY TO DO MORE.

FIST LOGIC

ONLY OUT OF THE ‘WHAT’, CAN EMERGE THE ‘HOW’.

THINK LIKE A CHESS COMPUTER AND DEAL WITH THE JOB AT HAND.

Something that I think we are all a little bit guilty of is to think that there is more to dealing with violence than there is, we all do it, and I am not sure if there is any way to prevent this, so our best way forwards is to accept it and find a way to work around it.

A well proven method to improve anything is to reduce it to the simplest form that can still do the same work.

This is the Principal of Parsimony. {A.K.A. Occam’s Razor}.

The principle that the most acceptable explanation of an occurrence, phenomenon, or event is the simplest, involving the fewest entities, assumptions, or changes.

This is the philosophy of many Martial Art styles, but it is by no way the practice.

Even with Wing Chun, which has at its core the Principle of Simplicity, we spend many years learning how to deal with something that happens in a split second.

Can you relate to the tale below…

As a kid I was a decent Chess player, I represented my School and up until my early 30s I was an active member of a chess club. 

Like all chess enthusiasts I had dozens of books, I re-played famous games from past masters to try to improve my game, and like everyone else I thought that we must be able to see 5 or more moves ahead.

Then around 1983  I bought my first consumer level chess computer.

Even at its lower levels I lost.

I only began to win games once I began to play the way the computer played. And that was by treating every move as a seperate problem that only needed to solve that single situation.

I was still a chess club player and in what appeared to everyone else as overnight, I began to win a great deal more matches than I lost, along the way I took some notable scalps for my current standing, to be expected the much better players still beat me, but I went from “D” grade to “B” grade in 2 tournaments.

THINK LIKE A CHESS COMPUTER AND DEAL WITH THE JOB AT HAND.

From a personal prospective what is the problem we are trying to solve? 

What is the simplest way of solving it?

For instance….

From a “Fighting” perspective this is simply “how do I hit my opponent”?

As a Self-Defence problem it becomes “how do I stop my opponent hitting me”?

This approach allows for great personalisation instead of trying to make someone else’s IDEA work for us.

So how do we stop someone from hitting us?

The answers vary from run away, to hit them first, and all things in between.

But whichever answer we choose it will be our own answer.

Now we can direct our training into something we think is a good IDEA.

But how do we train that IDEA without getting swayed by our partisan bias?

FIST LOGIC

RELEASING FORCE.

IS IT THE WATER, OR IS IT THE DAM?

My Tennis coach would tell me that “It makes no difference how hard you hit the ball if the other guy can’t reach it”.

Something that should be completely obvious to all of us, and I think it is, is that making contact is the only game in town.

And that is coming from a Self-defence guy.

Be it a fist, a forearm, an elbow strike, a headbut, a knee strike, a shin kick or a foot up the watusi, if we do not make contact with our attacker when we interact, it is down hill all day.

Forget style or technique, if we are not hitting them, they are hitting us.

As this thread started off from the IDEA of hitting harder and working to that end, my own experiences tell me that by far the most important thing is to hit first.

To use a quote from my tennis coach back when I was competing at club level, “it does not matter how slow a ball is going if your opponent cant reach it”.

Being first gives us a great, and frequently a winning, advantage.

So the first consideration is how do we make contact before our attacker takes the high ground.

The key is to delay the attack until missing is more difficult than landing the blow.

When we understand it, this is the impetus of the one inch punch.

VIDEO

Because of what my Tennis coach told me I am more of a results guy than a methodology guy.

Only out of the “WHAT” can emerge the “HOW”.

FIST LOGIC

THE SOUND OF ONE HAND CLAPPING.

Being focused took it to the next level.

There is a huge misconception about warriors and spirituality, mostly based around the Samurai, the ancient Greeks and Spartans practice of meditation and developing a strong sense of ethics.

These legendary warriors where not planning for the next life but rather trying their level best to find a way to survive in this one.

Simply put, meditation and living honestly enabled them to develop the ability to hold the smallest of things in crisp, unblinking focus, while still being aware of the world around them.

Can you even imagine what it would be like to take part in a clash of clans, tribes or states?

The noise would be deafening, horses braying, men screaming, drums and horns blaring and steel crashing into steel, the air filled with smoke and the smell of death.

Not being overwhelmingly distracted amid all of  this was almost a super power.

Being focused took it to the next level.

It was this ability more than any swordsmanship or strategy that gave them the best chance of survival.

The favourite tool to help achieve this state was the Zen Koan and the Greeks Cynicism.

In Zen/Chan Buddhism a Koan is a paradoxical anecdote or riddle without a solution, used to demonstrate the inadequacy of logical reasoning and provoke enlightenment.

Ancient Greek Cynicism served the same end.

Be here now”.

In the todays society we term these things thought experiments and talk of cognitive dissonance, but the goal is the same.

Keep your eye on the prize.

WHAT KIND OF DAY IS IT?