Author: The "D" Man

HI GUY’S.

This post is mostly for Saleh, Rick, and Kunal, but it is still important for you guys who have been with me for years.

Read it and if there is anything that needs further explanation bring it in with you and we will devote the evening to it.

Stay frosty.

In a live performance, theory counts for shit!

At training last Friday Saleh and Rick initiated a conversation about the dynamics of violence.

It was an intelligent and insightful conversation, and Salah asked if I would do a post on the subject so that he could refer to it when needed.

This conversation is not as simple as we may wish because Violence is a complex and ever-changing environment that unfortunately never has just one answer.

Especially as most situations can be as good as decided before the fists fly, and the most important and defining factors have nothing to do with the style of Martial Art we practice, at least not directly.

But to begin with I wish to address an old chestnut.

“Does Wing Chun, or any Martial Art, work in a Street Fight’?

This is a silly question ‘put out there’ to create mayhem amongst ‘Keyboard Warriors’.

We may as well ask…

“Does the Pentatonic Scale, or Arpeggios, or even Guitar licks work in a RockConcert”?

Forms = Scales.

Arpeggios = Chi Sau.

Killer Riffs = Techniques.

To prevent the Internet from exploding let’s choose to answer this way…

“IT DEPENDS”!!

There is little doubt that someone banging out a tune on a guitar who has deep knowledge of Scales, and arpeggios and knows a hat full of killer riffs will create far more interesting music than someone without this knowledge.

But in a one-off 10-second burst it could be close, and that is the point.

If two guys picked up a guitar at a party, I would put my money on the trained musician to be better, just as if an argument broke out I would put my money on the trained martial artist to do better.

But it is not a sure bet.

In a live performance, theory counts for shit!

Let me try to explain why.

No two ‘Violent Encounters’ are ever the same, I think we all know this, so it calls into question the wisdom of learning any system as an answer.

As I have said many times, I do not regard Wing Chun as a fighting system, but as a method of organisation that once understood just happens to help us perform optimally in violent situations.

But it requires that we have some level of control over our own emotions, thinking and movement.

There is much more to come in this direction, ask me about it.

MOVE FAST AND BREAK THINGS.

That bloke from FaceBook.

what on earth were we doing last year?

Hey guys.

The first video of 2024, and the question is how do we get what we think we got.

This is a very important topic, and not just for our Wing Chun, if you can do some research of your own.

Every new year our training should involve a new approach, if we need to cover old ground again, in the same way, what on earth were we doing last year?

But the IDEA remains the same, constant, fundamental.

We can only get so far by training in purely physical expressions of Wing Chun, no matter what those physical expressions are, techniques, Chi Sau, and even Forms.

Physical work will allow us to know how to make these movements, but only the thinking that created them can lead us to advanced understanding.

There is only one Wing Chun, one way of accessing the Wing Chun IDEA.

Furthermore, there really is no right way / wrong way to do things.

Let me clarify this a bit, when training if we are involved in a specific exercise, then yes, there is a right/wrong way for that specific training IDEA, but this is not, as may be thought, about correctness, it is about consistency.

If we are doing an exercise differently on each pass-through, even if it is only by the smallest amount, as far as our Brain is concerned we are doing different exercises, and this will have a negative flow-on to how we remember this IDEA, and to be expected a negative flow-on to how we retrieve that memory, in particular when we remember the IDEA intending to use the skill.

So it is only right/wrong in the context of that specific exercise, and at that particular time, and not in the wider IDEA of how we would use our skill set.

As I have mentioned many times, we will never use the things we do in training out in the wild, we will always need to refine/adjust/adapt them to the situation, so the important thing is to lay down a consistent ‘Default Base Idea’.

This ‘Default Base Idea’ is of course where the term ‘Basics” comes from.

Any physical exercise/action in Wing Chun is always just a way for us to explore the fundamental IDEA behind that action.

The chosen method of approaching and exploring the IDEA can vary in the extreme, with every Instructor and every School free to do this in any way that they feel comfortable with.

But the IDEA remains the same, constant, fundamental.

Once we understand this we can learn from any Instructor, even when their physical or external approach looks completely different to our own.

It allows us to participate in another school’s exercises and approaches without clashing with our own approach.

Which has the potential to end the constant bickering around the opinion that  “My school or sifu is better than your school or sifu”

There is only one Wing Chun.

We are all individuals with different levels of understanding and different life experiences, and this difference is multiplied over generations, so some approaches will be easier to access for us than others, but the IDEA is the same.

What is even more remarkable is that not only can we train in different approaches to Wing Chun and still train the same fundamentals, but once our knowledge is deep enough we can train in a totally different martial art and still explore the fundamental aspects of Wing Chun.

This becomes abundantly clear once we focus on the similarities between various methods instead of the differences that they all most certainly have.

Many basic Western Boxing Footwork drills, if slowed down enough and looked at as a collection of single moves, as we do with our FORMS, are almost identical to how we play the Baat Cham Dao Form, and many Muay Thai techniques again slowed down, reflect Biu Gee to an uncanny extent.

There is, and always was, going all the way back to Dr Leung Jan, only one IDEA of Wing Chun.

And no matter how differently we all do it…

…we all do it.

THE “D” MAN.

In fact, it is because what we are training will never be used that we need to be even better at it.

Some students embrace it while other students try to not even think about it, but we cannot escape the fact that what we do in training will never be used out in the wild.

All types of training, in every style, will always need to be creatively adapted to suit the situation we find ourselves in when the ‘Brown And Sticky Gets Airborne’, this really should be a great big “DUH”, or ‘Facepalm’ moment.

Accepting that nothing we do will ever be used can be remarkably liberating.

I have always found this a positive way of thinking, it allows me, in fact almost forces me, to think deeply about what the training is showing, it encourages me to work on the shapes and movement in different sizes, different directions, in particular doing things in reverse, yes, do the whole move, or even Form backward.

And I do not get distracted by thoughts of ‘Will this shit fly”?

I know from the very beginning that it will not fly, unless of course I can find a way to make it fly, and the more I know about any movement, shape, or even IDEA the higher the chance I can make it operational.

But this does not mean that we can be in any way ‘half-assed’ about our training, especially solo training, where there is no one to correct or motivate us.

In fact, it is because what we are training will never be used that we need to be even better at it.

If we are looking at adapting something we know the more accurate, more internalised, and most importantly the closer to perfect the movement or IDEA is then the better will be the adaptation. 

This situation is like what we find with a computer, G.I.G.O. which as we know stands for “Garbage in, garbage out”.

If we can reach a position where we fully accept that training is just training, we begin to, almost surreptitiously, accelerate the work of suppressing the ego, which is a far more valuable asset than any technique could ever be.

If the work we are doing is never going to be used for real, then why are we doing it and what is the value?

Very often the learning objective is not obvious, the real gold needs to be dug up.

We can use an aspect of the stance to illustrate this really well.

Wether we are using the YEE GEE KIM YEUNG MA, the basic Wing Chun Stance, or we are using the BO MA, which is the Horse Stance from the Pole and the Knives, both of them share the action of rotating the leg, albeit in opposite directions.

The Y.C.K.Y.Ma uses adduction, it turns the leg inwards toward the centre, while the Bo Ma uses abduction, it turns the leg outwards away from the centre.

Both actions create TORSION, and torsion improves stability of the joints, which inhibits loss of power transmission.

The ‘IDEA’ of  TORSION can be used in any shape and is naturally present in many of our fundamental movements, such as Taan Sau, and Bong Sau, both of which create a small amount of torsion in the forearm and upper arm bringing healthy stability to shoulder and elbow joint, both extremely important aspects of structure and power transmission.

Once we see this, and make the connection, we instinctively become more confident about this action. Confidence reduces stress, reduced stress helps us relax, and increased relaxation just makes stuff work better.

This is a cycle of improvement that happens if we are aware of it or not.

Frequently what we think we are training is not the “nugget” that we will get the best value from, just like the role of rotation, which we tend to think is just an aspect of the methodology.

I think we all understand that any adaptations we make to our training, at the moment of using it, when it is go time, will pretty much be a background task carried out by our ‘Mind-Intention Matrix’ and not a deliberate, conscious decision.

The wider the selection of accurate, correct movements that are available the more chance the ‘Man inside” has of creating something amazing.

What our ‘Mind-Intention Matrix’ chooses to adapt and use will always be beyond our control, so filling our ‘Long Term Memory’ with anything other than optimal information could seriously backfire when it picks something that is just no good because we did not train it properly.

If we think of all the potential benefits that we can get from accepting that training is just training and has F.A. to do with violence, even if just for a minute, then we must factor in all of the opposite, negative things that can come from thinking that what we train is what we will use.

I have personal experience of hitting someone with what I thought was my best shot and seeing him just blink.

I think that hurt me more than the smack in the head that he delivered.

I wouldn’t tell you if it wasn’t true..

We cannot be in two different, contrasting states at the same time.

There is a widely held opinion that Wing Chun is a Self-defence system, purely because it is a Counter-Attacking style, but this is a poor way of looking at things.

Mohamed Ali and Floyd Mayweather Junior were both predominately Counter-attackers, even Mike Tyson, despite his aggression, was fundamentally a counter-puncher, but I do not think that anyone considers Pugilism, especially at the Elite level, as a self-defence system.

This is a complex consideration that is far more a psychological puzzle than a physical or stylistic one. 

How we frame Wing Chun in our thinking, how we internalise it, will have a direct and immense impact on not only how we use it but more importantly how we understand the training.

If we wish to train in a way that somewhere down the track does not sow confusion, we must consciously decide whether we are training for self-defence situations or training to fight, because they are very different situations that make some automatic and fundamental differences to everything we do and think.

Self-defence is two people telling themselves different stories, looking for different outcomes, whereas fighting is two people telling themselves the same story, looking for the same outcome.

Let’s look at it this way, the attacker is a guy with a hosepipe and the defender is the poor guy being soaked.

To the attacker, the only considerations are the things he wants to do, in this instance soaking the other guy, there is no thought for the other guy, there is no respect or fear just a wish to be dominant at all costs.

To the defender it is a similarly myopic situation, he does not care about the attacker, there is no searching for telegraphed movements or weakness’, no thought of dealing with the attacker’s strategy, he just wants to get out of the deluge.

Fighting is more a battle of wills than skill, the need not to lose overruled by the wish to win, patience, and planning, pay big dividends.

The desired objective in self-defence is escape and survival, and high on the wish list is to dish out a debilitating injury or something along the lines of a one-shot-knockout, whereas fighters are up for a war of attrition and work deliberately at wearing the opponent down.

We could look at it through the lens of cause and effect, what the attacker does causes the effect of defending.

In an attempt to illuminate the situation, we could consider this a ‘Cause State’ and an ‘Effect State’, the ‘Cause State’ is always dynamic, making things happen, and the ‘Effect State’ is always stuck in a reactive loop.

We cannot be in two different, contrasting states at the same time.

The real skill is not as we may think, it is not being able to switch from the effect state to the cause state, for reasons driven by ego this offer is never on the table, but to be able to establish a neutral state where we can evaluate and make sound decisions.

There is no ‘Neutral’ for a fighter.

When two people fight they are both firmly ensconced in the cause state, and frequently we will see a person getting punched stupid but still trying to push forward and cause damage to the other.

It is often overlooked in training but the first thought we have is the most important, if it is a poor thought it can instantly turn into the last thought.

All the training in the world is of little use if we are forced into an effect state when all we know is what to do in the cause state.

The most important decisions are made before the first punch is thrown.

All in all, he was a serious dude with serious fighting skills.

HAPPY NEW YEAR ‘INC’AS.

Every new year is ‘Rinse and Repeat’, you all know the drill by now, start at the beginning and see if we missed anything on the last run-through.

We usually have, I did for years upon years.

As we all agree, and tell anyone willing to listen, Wing Chun is a ‘Concept Driven’ Martial Art.

Concepts are not physical, and to a very large degree Concepts do not live in the present moment, they are an IDEA that we intend to develop and take forward.

If they exist at all they exist in the future, but we endeavor to train them today.

This is head-banging stuff, especially on the day after New Year’s Eve.

What we need more than anything else, especially here at the restart, is to reject the already known, the familiar, the accepted dogma and engage in abstract thinking.

Wing Chun today is a long way removed from what it was at its inception back in the mid-1860s by Dr Leung Jan of Foshan.

It is a long way removed from what Ip Man taught in Hong Kong back in the mid-1950s.

Wing Chun is a concept-driven Martial Art, and as more people navigate and share its theories, it evolves and is reborn anew and it always will evolve.

But at its heart, it is still the same Wing Chun that Dr Leung Jan developed, and Ip Man carried forward.

If we wish to give ourselves the best chance of understanding the “Concept or perhaps Concepts” that live at the heart of Wing Chun we would do well to engage in a thought exercise around why Dr Leung Jan found the need to begin a process that changed his personal approach to Martial Arts usage, and as such create Wing Chun.

Who was Dr Leung Jan?

As far as we know he was a Herbalist and Chinese Medicine Practitioner who worked closely with the Red Boat Opera Troupe that performed around the Pearl River Delta on the S.E. Coast of China.

The shows that made up the programs of all Chinese Opera of that time contained Complex Martial depictions that called on every known Martial Art, in his role as the troupe’s doctor he, Dr Leung Jan, would have first-hand knowledge of what Martial Arts techniques damaged the body and which techniques didn’t damage the body, simply from repairing the actors.

Because of this, he would have naturally, almost without thinking, recommended removing or avoiding stances, movements, and techniques that carried negative physical consequences.

 And those techniques that remained he would have advised on finding an easier way, as all doctors do.

Again as far as we know, Dr Leung Jan was a celebrated and famous tournament fighter in Foshan, who in some accounts had over 300 fights.

 While this number is obviously not a true number, we can read it as shorthand for him having had many, many fights.

It is reported that he never lost any of his fights, this again should be taken as an exaggeration, no one ‘never loses’, but I think we can safely assume that his success rate was impressive.

All in all, he was a serious dude with serious fighting skills.

The time was 1864ish and the Pearl River Delta was aflame due to the Red Turban Rebellion, a catastrophic Civil War. 

As is always the case in Civil Wars, law and order had collapsed, muggings, home invasions and burglaries would have become commonplace, and as Dr Leung Jan was a wealthy man with his own Herbalist shop it is not hard to imagine that he was a regular target.

Taking all of this into consideration we can begin the thought exercise…

… Why did this well-respected, successful Martial Artist find the need to refine what he did and the way that he did it?

The first consideration must be ‘Why does someone change a winning formula’?

The only reason anyone would change a winning formula is because the winning formula no longer worked.

This speaks to the heart of the difference between tournament fighting and self-defence.

Tournament fighting is organised, social, and planned out.

Self-defence is everything but this, the situations are always unexpected, always a surprise.

Surprise is the key.

Dealing with surprise needs instinct more than strategy.

Dealing with surprise needs whatever action is chosen to work straight away, there is no room for working out the opponent’s rhythm and looking for weaknesses to exploit later.

Dealing with surprise relies on us knowing our own skills because our opponent’s skills would be unknown.

Dealing with surprise needs creativity more than conditioning.

Dealing with surprise is far more emotional and psychological than it is physical.

List as many things as you can think of, there must be hundreds more, and do not shy away from the manifestation of fear and its repercussions.

In my thought exercise… Dr. Leung Jan would be awoken in the night by unfamiliar noises coming from his shop, half asleep and unsure of what was going on he would find someone behind his counter looking for money, and he would be set upon by a second thief he had not seen.

In the crowded environment of his shop, and of course in the dark, he would have little if any space to move around, and half asleep would be unsure where he could safely move to.

This is the worst possible environment for a tournament fighter, even a celebrated, successful tournament fighter.

Thinking about this scenario as a root cause it is easy to understand why he based his refinements around the five principals of…

1. SIMPLICITY.

2. PRACTICALITY.

3. DIRECTNES.

4. ECONOMY OF MOVEMENT.

5. MINIMUM USE OF BRUTE FORCE.

The world has moved on and our requirements may differ but very little else has changed.

A Violent Surprise still needs the same responses.

This is why Wing Chun was brought into being.

If it was just about fighting, Dr Leung Jan had no need to change.

So if we follow the thinking of Wing Chun’s progenitor, we see that Wing Chun concepts are not about fighting, or rather not about learning how to fight, but are intended to improve an already present skill set to work under conditions of unexpectedness, unpreparedness, and surprise.

It was and still is, about developing emotional and physiological stability in the face of violence.

It is easy to misunderstand this aspect of Wing Chun and to think that consciously working on the non-physical, non-fighting aspect of Wing Chun is of little value in a violent situation, but this is incorrect.

As contradictory as it sounds, it is the very fact that we are involved in a non-physical, non-fighting activity that infuses and improves our Self-defence ability by magnitudes of intensity.

Fighting is nothing more than two EGOs battling for supremacy, no need to think too much, just go hard and do as much damage as possible to the other guy.

Fighting is always EGO-driven, malevolent, and malicious.

Self-defence is about smart decision-making, it is Conflict Resolution, and easier to achieve with a clear mind, a good heart, and no thought of malice.

Even though we may cause harm it is not because of a wish to do so, it is simply survival, the most natural of Human Instincts.

It is as if the closer we come to the perfection of movement the clearer the IDEA becomes.

Hey guy’s,

I hope you are all at least thinking about Wing Chun, in between Mince Pies of course, if the excess sugar that is Christmas has not eaten your brains here is something to engage your little grey cells.

As we are all well aware Wing Chun is a ‘Concept Driven’ Martial Art.

But what concept is doing the driving?

As you all know, I believe that if we are focusing on simply perfecting the physical actions of Wing Chun we are at odds with the intentions of its founder, Dr Leung Jan of Foshan, who was simply trying to improve his shit at a very bad time in Chinese history.

But how does that help us today?

My Sifu would say that we learn Wing Chun in three steps, or waves, or perhaps cycles.

1. Copy the moves of your teacher.
2. Once copied, make these movements your own.
3. Once the moments are your own, let the mind do the work.

As ‘Out there’ as this approach sounds, and for quite a while I thought it to be nothing more than Kung Fu Mumbo Jumbo, it hooked me deep, and trying to understand what he meant has been central to all of my personal work.

While he was with us, my Sifu would help with my search, but his suggestions and hints were as mysterious as the original three-step IDEA.

For instance, I would be standing doing S.L.T. Form and he would ask me what my ankles were doing.

On another occasion, he told me that ‘Wing Chun operates in the spaces before contact and after contact’.

But one thing he did tell me that has proved to be of great value, at least to me anyway, was that the Forms are how we look for the IDEA.

The Forms ‘ARE’ the ‘Concept’ if we can just realise it.

In my ongoing search to find this Concept or perhaps even Concepts, I have discovered several ways to engage with the training so that we can almost ‘feel’ the IDEA.

As I have said, I do not think that the physical actions are the point of the training, but I also think that it is only once we can replicate the movements seamlessly, effortlessly, and correctly, all of our movements, not just the Forms, that we can get the scent of the IDEA.

As if the closer we come to the perfection of movement the clearer the IDEA becomes.

It appears to be almost essential that we hold a decent understanding of  Wing Chun from the perspective of how a body performs it, i.e. ‘how we actually, physically do it’, before we can unlock Wing Chun as a mind.

And let it do the work.

But this can cause some confusion because Concepts only exist in the mind.

This reminds me of a quote from Brian Clough, the at the time manager of Nottingham Forest F.C…

   … “On paper, we should have won this game, but unfortunately it was played on grass”.

Can we transfer the training in our mind to the street?

I believe we can.

I realise that the following statement may sound ridiculous, but, we must find a way to take Wing Chun out of the work.

Yet again we find ourselves in the territory of the ‘Finger pointing at the moon’.

When Dr. Leung Jan began the work that became Wing Chun, his intention was to refine and simplify his existing skill set, which was more than likely a Shaolin style.

He was not aiming at inventing a new way to fight, he could already do that.

Wing Chun, it appears, is about how we use a trained skill set, and how we use the way we fight.

This is why firstly we learn the physical fighting stuff, it is only once we have this in the bag that we begin the work that is Wing Chun.

Most of us are seniors and have a good grasp of the fighting stuff, so this letting the mind do the work is where we need to be looking.

For those of you who may think you lack something in the fighting stuff area, I will fast-track you so that you can at least connect to the mind stuff.

If you think back to an earlier post I pointed out that all that is needed to win a fight is to sidestep and then poke the Bad Guy in the eye, I can teach that in 2 minutes.

Let’s dig deep in 2024.

As a bit of a heads-up for next year answer me this…

… is a Stance a SHAPE, or an IDEA?

I WOULDN’T TELL YOU IF IT WASN’T TRUE.

THE ‘D’ MAN.

The difference between a Master and a Journeyman is measured by the depth of their knowledge much more than the quantity of their knowledge.

A few years after the passing of my teacher, and just as I had opened my own school, one of his senior Wing Chun brothers, Sifu Mo Chi Pu, visited us here in Australia.

I attended a workshop with a number of my students, wearing our new club shirt, which had on it in Chinese the script ‘Year of the Tiger 2010’.

 Another person at the workshop pointed at the shirts and quite disrespectfully said that I could not even get the Chinese words correct, Sifu Mo immediately admonished the man and said that it was indeed proper Chinese and that it was he, and all his generation, who could not speak proper Chinese, and that this script was the same Chinese script that would have been used by Ip Man himself.

This was of course just good luck on my part that the person I asked to give me the translation, who was older and better educated than the complainant, spoke proper Chinese.

On a subsequent visit, Sifu Mo stayed at my house and we talked about many things Wing Chun, including the changing role of language, and the passing on of information.

Understanding is governed by the quality of information.

Where we source that information and how we assimilate that information can be as important as the information itself.

Often the deeper content of the information is gained from reading in-between the lines so to speak.

From NUANCE.

The difference between a Master and a Journeyman is measured by the depth of their knowledge much more than the quantity of their knowledge.

But as language shifts, and gets bastardised, how do we curate genuine information for future generations.

The above tale points out another serious problem.

If we do not speak the source language we are always dependent on another person’s translation, even more perilous another person’s ability to understand and transmit NUANCE.

In a society where more people watch YouTube than read books we are in danger of losing the ability to “read in between the lines”.

Video is a sledgehammer, it rams information at us and into us so quickly and continually that there is no time to stop and think about the finer points as the next clip is already playing.

Yes, we could pause it, and engage of mind in contemplation, but how often do we do that?

Words, however, can stop us in our tracks.

The difference between the experience of the word Tarn Sau and a video clip of Tarn Sau are a few universes apart.

Lets us use Tarn Sau, Fook Sau, and Bong Sau as examples, but we could choose any of the movements.

When you say the word Tarn Sau what image does your mind produce?

The image in your ‘mind’s eye’ will be similar to a video.

Now think about what Tarn Sau means as a word, what it is as a movement, and how to perform it.

Different experiences I bet.

To understand Tarn Sau we must know what it means as a word, or more accurately as an IDEA.

But the Chinese language is logographic while Western languages are phonetic/syllabic, there is no equivalency and not even all Chinese people read the logograms the same way.

From my understanding {taking account of the fact that I do not read Mandarin} reading Chinese characters is all about interpretation, which of course leads to NUANCE.

My Sifu was a well-educated Hong Kong Chinese who spoke excellent English, his Wing Chun translations are the equal of any so I have always stuck with them.

He would describe Tarn Sau in two ways, as “Lay flat hand” and on other occasions, he would say “Palm up hand”.

While these explanations are clearly the same thing there is also great difference.

‘Lay flat hand’ implies movement, as in the laying flat action, while ‘Palm up hand’ implies orientation or shape, two different trains of thought heading to two different destinations.

‘Fook Sau’ was described to me as the controlling hand, where does this train of thought lead us?

‘Bong Sau’ translated to the ‘Wing Arm’, how do we explain this with a video?

Sil Lim Tao was translated to me as “The Little Idea”, yet we have six Forms with almost 1000 movements, Chi Sau, and numerous applications to show us this Little Idea.

Chinese characters are logograms that are constructed from ‘Little Ideas’.

In English, we could easily translate ‘The Way of the Little Idea’ as the way of the NUANCE.

We all know that Wing Chun is not about the movement or the shapes, it is about using these movements and shapes to reveal the ‘LITTLE IDEA’.

To find the ‘LITTLE IDEA’ we must develop the ability to read between the lines, this is what the Forms are for, to allow us a safe place to practice reading in-between the lines.

With Video presentations, any spaces between the lines get filled in with advertisements.

Yet the deepest truths are best read between the lines,

and for the most part,

refuse to be written.

Amos Bronson Alcott.