The Italic words are mine, the “D” Man’s, words.

One issue I have always had with Wing Chun is that most Students live in a bubble, everything is about Sigung this Sifu that and the Good Stuff only comes from Hong Kong, while there is nothing wrong with being proud of your Lineage, proud of where you come from it does not count for much in a Street Fight, I am, always have been and always will be a person that respects people that have “Been there and done it” even if they are complete nobodies in the overall Big Ticket World of the Martial Arts,  some conversations I have been in lately have prompted me to once again direct the interested in the direction of Rory Miller, this piece was first posted  on my Blog back in 2013 but good information never goes stale,  it is from his Chiron Training Blog, as a Martial Artist his experience was gained in Correctional Facilities in the U.S.

He has been involved in situations none of us would wish to replicate.

He runs courses for Police all over the World on Violence Dynamics.

As a writer he is intelligent and honest here is a taste from this  article.

To get good at unarmed dueling is to develop skill at a very bad strategy.

Other than for fun or sport or balancing things within a social group, people don’t square off.  Because it’s dumb. 

Rory has written some excellent books on violence and self defence, they are all well worth checking out.  They are available through Amazon.




Martial Mistake

The list won’t be exhaustive, and I wish all of the things on here were simple and had simple solutions.  Most martial arts training isn’t effective for SD purposes.  Some of it is on the teaching end, and some of that is on the learning end, and some is in the culture.

That last sentence might take a long time to sink in, so examples:  Teaching by rote wires the reactions to the wrong part of the brain for use in a fight.  Bad teaching.  The most exciting aspect of training feels the most realistic, even if it requires the most artificiality to maintain safety.  The student will take away the wrong lesson.  Bad learning.  And a hierarchical cult of obedience is exactly what an exploitive predator dreams about.  Sometimes the culture farms victims.

The dueling paradigm.  Other than for fun or sport or balancing things within a social group, people don’t square off.  Because it’s dumb.  If you had to take out the biggest, scariest martial athlete you can imagine, how would you do it?  Exactly.  From behind with a weapon.  And maybe friends.

This has a lot of implications for MA/SD.  The paradigm sets you up to expect distance, time and warning, none of which will exist unless you are monkey dancing.  People who are successful at dueling or sparring believe (sometimes, I hope rarely) that the skills will transfer to ambush survival…and they don’t.

Unarmed.  With the exceptions of corrections, hospital security, and secure mental facilities, almost no profession goes hands-on unarmed.  Because it is stupid.  If you know things are going to go bad, you get a weapon.  And friends.  And intel.  And surprise.  Crime, by the way, is another profession that uses weapons.  And this goes back to the dueling/sparring paradigm.  To get good at unarmed dueling is to develop skill at a very bad strategy, a strategy which has the sole purpose of stroking your ego.  Don’t quit playing.  I love to play.  But don’t make it something it’s not.  If someone was trying to kill someone you loved would you tap them on the shoulder and step back so that they could face you at the appropriate distance?  Or would you hit them in the back of the neck with the best tool you could find?  Your choice, but one choice is stupid and that choice is the one you have likely practiced most.

Inbreeding.  You train together and you get used to dealing with each other.  When I taught at a dojo, my class were infighters.  They were really good at doing all the things that infighters do.  But nature of a class setting, they were spending all of their time practicing against other infighters, which is a pretty rare category.  Frankly, this is a slight problem for infighters and grapplers.  It takes very little to close range, especially at ambush distance.  But it can be a huge problem for strikers.

Bad metrics.  How do you measure if something works?  The military has a “Lessons Learned” program.  My team, and Search and Rescue and even the Reception crew when I was sergeant there used After-Action Debriefing protocols.  This will get you better continuously– provided you have actions to debrief.  Without those actions, it is much harder.  I wonder what percentage of students of an SD instructor are attacked on average, how often…  but I feel the numbers are too low.

When people don’t have a reality check they have this really stupid tendency to make up a reality check.  ‘Make up’ and ‘reality’ rarely belong in the same thought.  I almost always pick on karate for this.  When I look at their kata and kihon, they have possibly the best body mechanics for infighting that I’ve seen… then they choose to test it at sparring range, where it sucks.  Or, worse, point contact range where it sucks AND it screws up everybody’s sense of distance and time.

Scenarios can be solid gold to test some things, but only if the scenarios are incredibly realistic (ideally based on real events) and the role players are superb actors and the facilitator really knows his stuff, especially the debrief.  Without that it can ingrain incredibly bad habits.  Doing the instructor’s fantasy at high speed is still doing fantasy.

The Safety/Effectiveness scale.  Fighting, especially recovery from ambush, is a very dangerous thing.  One of the biggest challenges is training people to fight without injuring them.  Straight up, if neither you nor your opponent are scared or need medical attention, it’s not a fight.  It has nothing to do with fighting.  Trying to approximate the skills without the injuries is a very fine line.  Weapons arts have the advantage in that they can make the weapons safe.  Much harder to do with throws and neck twists.  MA tend to make the techniques safe…and more safe the higher speed the training.  And so the safety artifacts ingrain right along with the techniques.

Modality.  Related to metrics.  The measure of effectiveness is how much damage something does.  Do bones break?  Does the guy go down?  Again, less of a problem in grappling arts, but a hellish issue in striking arts.  When you can’t actually do what you are supposed to do (collapse tracheas or cause concussions, say) the instructor’s default seems to be whether it looked right.  Fighting is about touch, not about looks.  Pretty, crisp, geometrically clean can be seen.  Power and structure need to be felt.

There’s tons more here, but this is a start.

It is better to avoid than to run; better to run than to de-escalate; better to de-escalate than to fight; better to fight than to die.  The very essence of self-defense is a thin list of things that might get you out alive when you are already screwed.-  From “Meditations on Violence.


If you do Wing Chun for the Cultural Experience then you do not need people like Rory Miller, or me for that matter, but if you genuinely hope to be able to use your training when the going gets less then cordial his explanations about Violence can aid in making the training you love a thing of Shock and Awe.


Disagree, tell me why, if you agree give me a Pat on the Back

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.